prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike
2015. urn:nbn:hr:172:631307
Družijanić, Kristina
University of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Department of Philosophy

Cite this document

Družijanić, K. (2015). Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

Družijanić, Kristina. "Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

Družijanić, Kristina. "Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2015. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

Družijanić, K. (2015). 'Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike', Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, accessed 16 April 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

Družijanić K. Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2015 [cited 2024 April 16] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

K. Družijanić, "Povijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike", Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Split, 2015. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:631307

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitlePovijesnost kao temelj razumijevanja Gadamerove hermeneutike
AuthorKristina Družijanić
MentorAnte Vučković (mentor)
Committee memberAnte Vučković (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberMarita Brčić Kuljiš (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberTonći Kokić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Department of Philosophy)
Split
Defense date and country2015-10-20, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract
Prostor Gadamerova promišljanja, a tako i njegove hermeneutike, otvara pitanje kako je moguće razumijevanje? Odgovori na to pitanje impliciraju zahtjev filozofije slušanja u kojoj se mora uspostaviti dijalektika pitanja i odgovora. Proces dolaska do značenja tako se odvija u jeziku, koji nam omogućuje, u najgorem slučaju, da se stvari barem približimo, ako ne i da je razumijemo. Tumačeva situacija obilježena je njegovim predrasudama, preduvjerenjima, a situacija teksta prezencijom, ali i temporalnošću. Upravo je temporalnost umjetničkog djela osnova Gadamerovu poimanju tradicije, odnosno predaje, kojoj, pod Heideggerovim utjecajem, Gadamer pridaje regulativni karakter. Procijep između dvaju horizonata, tradicijsko-povijesnog i predrasudno-tumačeva, rješava se »stapanjem horizonata« kao krajnjim ishodom dijaloga, a to stapanje ujedno postaje temeljem razumijevanja. Iako je Gadamerova hermeneutika bila kritizirana, ona je ujedno nezaobilazna u proučavanjima interpretacije (književnog) teksta.
Abstract (english)
The space of Gadamer’s thought, as well as his hermeneutics, opens up a question: “how understanding is possible”? The answers to that question implicate ethico-aesthetical claim of “philosophy of listening” where this dialectics of questions and answers should be established. The proccess of coming to meaning is happening in language, that makes possible, in the worst circumastances, at least to approach to the matter of things, if not to understand it. The interpreteur’s situation is marked with his prejudices, prethinking and the situation of a text by its presence, as well as with temporality. It is precisely temporality of artwork, that is the foundation of Gadamer’s conception of tradition, i.e. heritage, which is, under Heidegger’s influence, supplied by regulative characteristics. The gap between two horizons – traditionally-historical and prejudice-interpreteur’s – is solved by “merging of horizons” as the final result of dialogue, and that merging is at the same time the basics of understanding. Even though Gadamer’s hermeneutics was criticized, it was also unsourmountable in the studies of interpreting (literary) texts.
Keywords
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:172:631307
Study programmeTitle: Philosophy; specializations in: /
Course: /
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije (magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2017-06-20 12:42:47