Kierkegaard's and Jaspers' existential discourses refer us to their own sources. In other words, the differences between their discourses reflect their existential differences withal. Kierkegaard accepts Socrates' communication model. He speaks about faith as a life form which arises from within it, dissociating it from everything else that is mistakenly understood as faith; opinion, knowledge and amazement. The truth of christianity is a paradox which is existentialy accepted by faith. Jaspers also insists on existential permeation of truth. However, according to him, the truth is not confined within a single religion. Therefore, he will find the truths which gained objective validity in lives of authentic people. That will confirm his thesis about inability to comprehend transcendence dogmaticaly, and, in addition, it will strenghten his faith in various possibilities for realization of freedom which finds its innermost realization in a close relationship with God.