prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?
2016. urn:nbn:hr:172:865843
Derado, Dora
University of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split

Cite this document

Derado, D. (2016). Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu? (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

Derado, Dora. "Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

Derado, Dora. "Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

Derado, D. (2016). 'Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?', Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, accessed 10 April 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

Derado D. Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu? [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split; 2016 [cited 2024 April 10] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

D. Derado, "Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?", Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, 2016. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:865843

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleKoliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?
Title (english)How Artistic is Prehistoric Artistry?
AuthorDora Derado
MentorVedran Barbarić (mentor)
Committee memberIvana Prijatelj Pavičić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberVedran Barbarić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split
Split
Defense date and country2016-09-26, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
History of Art
Abstract
Postavljajući glavno pitanje ovog rada: „Koliko je umjetnosti u prapovijesnom stvaralaštvu?“, nastojim razlikovati umjetnosti od ostalog ljudskog stvaralaštva. Nekolicina prapovijesnih artefakata, svaki poseban na svoj način i različit u mnogim aspektima, je provučena kroz filter brojnih teorija umjetnosti (počevši od antičkih pa sve do suvremenih teorija). U posljednjem poglavlju rada, iznosim vlastito viđenje umjetnosti na temelju mnoštva definicija umjetnosti koje su do tad bile predstavljene. Nadalje, tvrdim da postoji nekoliko minimalno nužnih kriterija koje umjetničko djelo treba zadovoljiti te mnoštvo dodatnih kriterija koji nam dalje pomažu razlikovati umjetnička djela prema njihovoj kvaliteti. U ovom procesu, iznova evaluiram prapovijesnu umjetnost, dajem prapovijesnom čovjeku kao kreativnom biću drugu priliku te dovodim u pitanje pojam umjetnosti uopće. Rezultat ovog preispitivanja (prapovijesne) umjetnosti je ideja da umjetnost nije crno-bijela već da je ona gradirani sustav unutar kojeg se predmeti mogu pomicati ovisno o kriterijima koji se na njih primijene. Odatle proizlazi moja upotreba otvorenog pitanja za naslov rada.
Abstract (english)
By asking the main question of this paper: „How artistic is prehistoric artistry?” I try to differentiate art from any other form of human creation. Several prehistoric artefacts, each special in their own way and different in many aspects, are tested by applying a filter of numerous art theories (dating from ancient times to the most contemporary theories). In the final chapter of this paper, I explain my own view of art based on the many definitions of art presented up to that point and argue that there are several minimally necessary criteria that art has to fulfill and many, many more complementary criteria that further help us differentiate artworks based on their quality. In this process, prehistoric art is reevaluated, prehistoric man given a second chance as a creative being and the notion of art in general is brought into question. The result of this reexamination of (prehistoric) art is the idea that art is not a black-and-white notion. Rather, it is a gradient scale on which objects can move depending on the criteria applied to them. Hence my use of an open-ended question for the title of the paper.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:172:865843
Study programmeTitle: Art History; specializations in: Teacher Education
Course: Teacher Education
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije povijesti umjetnosti (magistar/magistra edukacije povijesti umjetnosti)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2018-02-22 09:48:46