prikaz prve stranice dokumenta UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA
  Download
PDF 1.3 MB
master's thesis
UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA
2020. urn:nbn:hr:172:595589
Elek, Anđela
University of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split
Department of Philosophy

Cite this document

Elek, A. (2020). UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

Elek, Anđela. "UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

Elek, Anđela. "UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

Elek, A. (2020). 'UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA', Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, accessed 22 November 2023, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

Elek A. UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split; 2020 [cited 2023 November 22] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

A. Elek, "UTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA", Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, 2020. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:595589

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleUTJECAJ IMMANUELA KANTA NA FILOZOFIJU ZNANOSTI KARLA POPPERA
Title (english)THE INFLUENCE OF IMMANUEL KANT ON KARL POPPER'S PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
AuthorAnđela Elek
MentorHrvoje Relja (mentor)
GranterUniversity of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split
(Department of Philosophy)
Split
Defense date and country2020, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Abstract
U radu se uspoređuju filozofije znanosti Immanuela Kanta i Karla R. Poppera. Prvo se ukratko prikazuje Kantova filozofija znanosti izložena u Kritici čistoga uma. Ustanovljuje je da je njegova teorija spoznaje transcendentalna, odnosno, odnosi se na narav čovjekova spoznajnog aparata. Potom slijedi kratak pregled života Karla R. Poppera i njegove povezanosti s pripadnicima Bečkog kruga. Objašnjava se Humeova kritika indukcije kao logički neodrživog postupka. Objašnjava se kako članovi Bečkog kruga djelomično prihvaćaju Humeovu kritiku, ali svejedno smatraju da indukcija može pružiti smjernice za oblikovanje provjerljivih tvrdnji o stvarnosti. Prikazuje se Popperov stav o problemu indukcije izložen u Logici znanstvenog otkrića. Objašnjava se Popperova tvrdnja da indukciju nije moguće opravdati, jer se to može učiniti samo utvrđivanjem nekog drugog načela indukcije. Objašnjava se Popperov stav da je indukcija površna i logički nedosljedna. Prikazan je Kantov pokušaj opravdanja indukcije pozivajući se na sintetičke sudove a priori. Konačno, iznosi se Popperovo shvaćanje i konačno odbacivanje sintetičkih sudova a priori te se njegovo shvaćanje uspoređuje s Kantovim.
Abstract (english)
The paper compares Immanuel Kant's and Karl R. Popper's respective theories of scientific knowledge. First, a brief overview of Kant's theory of scientific knowledge, as given in the Critique of Pure Reason, is provided. It is established that Kant's theory of knowledge is trascendental, referring to the nature of the human cognitive apparatus. A brief overview of Karl R. Poppers life and his dealings with the members of the Vienna Circle are given. Hume's critic of induction as logically untenable is explained. Vienna Circle member's partial adoption of Hume's critic is explained, as well as their belief that induction can still give guidelines for the formation of testable statements about reality. Popper's own attitude on induction, as given in The Logic of Scientific Discovery, is presented. Popper's belief that induction cannot be justified, because such justification would require accepting some other induction principle, is explained. Popper's belief that induction is superficial and logically inconsistent is shown. Kant's attempt of justifying induction with synthetic a priori judgements is presented. Finally, Poppers understanding and ultimate rejection of synthetic a priori judgements is presented and his view is compared to that of Kant.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:172:595589
Study programmeTitle: Philosophy; specializations in: /
Course: /
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije (magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2020-09-28 07:59:12